Legal Opinion

Hasbrouck v. Van Winkle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1941PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This action was brought to foreclose a mortgage to secure the payment of the sum of $1,000.

Respondents, husband and wife, and appellant are the owners of adjoining farm lands in Ulster county, N. Y. In the summer of 1925 respondents were desirous of purchasing a parcel of appellant’s lands consisting of ten and eight-tenths acres. Apparently appellant, who was then engaged in practicing his profession of dentistry in New York city, was reluctant to sell. It is not disputed that respondents importuned him to convey the property to them on the plea that they wished to erect a house thereon. As…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bagley v. . PeddieNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  2. Gobble v. LinderIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Esmond v. Van BenschotenNew York Supreme Court · 1852
  4. Williams v. GreenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1854
  5. Smith v. BergengrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Amory H. Bradford v. The New York Times CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
  2. Rubenstein v. RubensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Jarro Building Industries Corp. v. SchwartzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1967
  4. McGuire v. More-Gas Invistment, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  5. Fairfield Lease Corp. v. 717 Pharmacy, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API