Legal Opinion

Cordova, Inc. v. Lloyd's Underwriters

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 4, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The policy contains the standard exclusion for "[l]oss or damage to property while in or upon any automobile * * * unless, at the time the loss or damage occurs, there is actually in or upon such vehicle, the Assured, or a permanent employee of the Assured, or a person whose duty it is to attend the vehi*180cle”. According to plaintiff, the jewelry was left in a locked car that its employee had momentarily got out of to pay a gas station attendant, and was stolen, in sight of its frightened employee, by thieves using a metal object to smash the car windows. Crediting this account and plaintiffs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royce Furs, Inc. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Jerome I. Silverman, Inc. v. Lloyd's UnderwritersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
  3. Wideband Jewelry Corp. v. Sun InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Davidoll Designs, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API