Cordova, Inc. v. Lloyd's Underwriters
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The policy contains the standard exclusion for "[l]oss or damage to property while in or upon any automobile * * * unless, at the time the loss or damage occurs, there is actually in or upon such vehicle, the Assured, or a permanent employee of the Assured, or a person whose duty it is to attend the vehi*180cle”. According to plaintiff, the jewelry was left in a locked car that its employee had momentarily got out of to pay a gas station attendant, and was stolen, in sight of its frightened employee, by thieves using a metal object to smash the car windows. Crediting this account and plaintiffs…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Royce Furs, Inc. v. Home InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Jerome I. Silverman, Inc. v. Lloyd's UnderwritersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Wideband Jewelry Corp. v. Sun InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by3 opinions
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- E.M.M.I. Inc. v. Zurich American InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Davidoll Designs, Inc. v. Reliance InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001