Legal Opinion

State v. Kalici

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 7, 2000No. SC96587PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for review Kalici v. State, 755 So.2d 680 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), on the ground of express and direct conflict with Peart v. State, 705 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998), quashed 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We recently held in Peart v. State, 756 So.2d 42 (Fla.2000), that prior to Wood v. State, 750 So.2d 592 (Fla.1999), a noncustodial defendant properly could have sought relief based on a trial court’s failure to advise him or her of the immigration consequences of a plea through a petition for writ of error coram nobis and that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  2. Peart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Peart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  4. Kalici v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friedrich v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Kalici v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API