Scovel v. Isham
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
In this action the appellants (hereinafter called the plaintiffs) sue to recover damages because of the alleged fraudulent representation made during the negotiations out of which grew the sale of the entire capital stock of Chadron State Bank to the plaintiffs. The negotiations leading up to the contract of purchase began ini June 1920, and the contract was signed on 3uly 30, 1920. The entire con*239sideration was paid and the transfer of the stock completed about August 16, 1920. In the bills receivable of the bank was a note for $6,875 signed by William Steadman and Bertha J. Steadman, dated…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Foley v. HoltryNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Luce v. FosterNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Ayers v. WolcottNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Warfield v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Redding v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Campbell v. C & C Motor Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1946
- Peterson v. SchabergNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- COOK LIVESTOCK COMPANY v. ReisigNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Platte Valley Bank v. LemkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Templeman v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.