Legal Opinion

Zwitzer v. Zoning Board of Appeals

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree, for so much of the reasons stated in the majority memorandum of the Appellate Division, that the Board of Zoning Appeals lacked a rational basis for granting only a partial 4% area variance rather than the entreatied 7% one. Petitioner property owner, having established to the satisfac*758tion of the Canandaigua Zoning Board of Appeals that he would suffer significant economic injury by the strict application of the zoning ordinance in this pertinent respect, was entitled to the area…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sanzone v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Children's Hospital v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Homes for the Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards & AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API