Legal Opinion

Pach v. Orr

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided June 23, 1888PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtTitus, J.

The defendant appeals from an order vacating and setting aside an order setting aside an attachment obtained by the plaintiff, from a judge at Chambers.

On the 30th day of December, 1887, the plaintiff on the complaint and affidavits obtained an attachment against the property of the defendant consisting of a stock of goods in his store No. 246 Main street, in this city. On the same day the judge granting the attachment set it aside on the ground, stated in the order for failure to comply with rule 25 of the General Rules of Practice, “without prejudice to a renewal on the same or other papers…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mojarrieta v. . SaenzNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Godfrey v. . GodfreyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Com. Ex Rel., to Use v. DelucaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API