Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Cortez v. Bentley

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 20, 1984No. 84-937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari, or in the alternative, a writ of mandamus commanding the trial court to show cause and to appoint counsel at public expense to represent the petitioner during his appeal of the trial court’s denial of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence. Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850.

Mandamus denied. A writ of mandamus “is by nature a discretionary writ which issues only upon the showing of a clear legal right in the relator to the performance of an indisputable legal duty by the respondent.” State ex rel. Eichenbaum v. Cochran, 114 So.2d 797, 800…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Eichenbaum v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. Heath v. BecktellSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. State v. GambleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN & FAMILY v. BurtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API