Miller's Estate

Lamorelle, P. J.,

The claims are barred by the statute of itation unless it be affirmatively shown by competent testimony that there 3 such acknowledgment of liability as would toll the statute.

These are the questions raised by the exceptions. There was but one wit-ss called — husband of one of the claimants. It is contended that, as he was e agent of his wife, he is a competent witness.

His agency, however, is dependent on his own testimony, uncorroborated, ich testimony is not sufficient to prove agency: See Stewart v. Climax Co., 0 Pa. 611; Lawall v. Groman, 180 Pa. 532; Flannery v.…