Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joyce Wheeler v. Encompass Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided May 24, 2013No. 2011-313-AppealPublished

1DissentJustice Robinson

I readily acknowledge that the issues presented in this case are subtle and challenging; but, after long reflection, I remain unpersuaded by the reasoning of my colleagues, and I therefore must respectfully dissent.

The majority correctly recognizes that Encompass’s objection to Ms. Wheeler’s petition qualifies as an “application” under G.L.1956 § 10-3-14(a). That objection triggered the trial justice’s review of the award. See City of East Providence v. United Steelworkers of America, Local 15509, 925 A.2d 246, 253-55 (R.I.2007). However, I believe that the majority’s discussion of the merits…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Purvis Systems, Inc. v. American Systems Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  2. Town of Coventry v. TurcoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1990
  3. Bush v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
  4. School Committee of North Kingstown v. CrouchSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  5. State, Department of Corrections v. Rhode Island Brotherhood of Correctional OfficersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API