Legal Opinion

Reeves & Co. v. Corrigan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1893PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Ransom County; Lauder, J. Action by Reeves & Co., a corporation, against William Corrigan and Eugene Maddox. Defendants had judgment, and, from an order denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.

This action is brought to recover $200 and interest as the alleged purchase price of an implement called a “Reeves Patent Straw Stacker,” which the complaint charges was sold by the plaintiff, a corporation, to defendants, at Lisbon, D. T., on September 21, 1888, for the agreed price of $200, to be paid in installments of $100 each, in November, 1888, and in November, 1889. Defendant Maddox, the partner of Corrigan, was not served with the summons, and never appeared in the action. Defendant Corrigan answered the complaint separately, and denied that the defendants, either jointly or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colean Manufacturing Co. v. BlanchettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Martyn v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
  3. Minnesota Thresher Manf'g Co. v. LincolnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  4. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. EbbighausenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API