Legal Opinion

Beale v. Rolley

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1989No. 88-SC-840-DGPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GANT, Justice.

This court granted discretionary review from an opinion of the Court of Appeals and, after briefing and oral arguments, affirms that court and adopts the opinion therein:

“BEFORE: GUDGEL, HOWARD, and WEST, Judges.
“GUDGEL, JUDGE: This is an appeal from a judgment entered by the Muhlen-berg Circuit Court affirming an opinion and order of the Workers’ Compensation Board which denied appellant’s KRS 342.-125 motion to reopen. Appellant contends that the board based its decision on a legal conclusion which is clearly erroneous. We agree. Hence, we reverse and remand.
“On July 14, 1981,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Special Fund v. FrancisKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  3. Continental Air Filter Co. v. BlairKentucky Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Mitsch v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
  5. Standard Products Co. v. EstesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McCollum v. GarrettKentucky Supreme Court · 1994
  2. McCollum v. GarrettKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API