Legal Opinion

People v. Harper

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s claim that the prosecutor misused his peremptory challenges to exclude black venirepersons is belied by the record, which reveals that the jury which convicted him included four blacks and that at least two, and possibly *594all three, of the alternates were black (see, People v Bush, 112 AD2d 1046). Furthermore, we note that the Assistant District Attorney did not exhaust all of his peremptory challenges despite the fact that four blacks remained on the jury.

It is apparent from a review of the record that the defendant was provided with "meaningful representation”, thus…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. SatterfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. Gary M.New York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. People v. CorpasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. People v. LoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. People v. RedishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. People v. S.R.New York Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API