Shim v. Rutgers-The State University
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court 1
924 A.2d 465 (2007)
191 N.J. 374
Ezrina SHIM, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
RUTGERS-The State University of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued January 29, 2007.
Decided June 14, 2007.
Gavin J. Rooney, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein Sandler PC, attorneys; Mr. Rooney and Kathleen A. Walsh, on the briefs).
H. Justin Park argued the cause for respondent (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Cherry Hill, attorneys).
2Opinion of the Court · LongJustice Long
In 2003, eighteen-year-old Ezrina Shim applied for admission to Rutgers University (Rutgers) for the fall term. At the time, she had lived in…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
3Cases cited28 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.