Legal Opinion

Shim v. Rutgers-The State University

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 14, 2007Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

924 A.2d 465 (2007)

191 N.J. 374

Ezrina SHIM, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RUTGERS-The State University of New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 29, 2007.

Decided June 14, 2007.

Gavin J. Rooney, Roseland, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein Sandler PC, attorneys; Mr. Rooney and Kathleen A. Walsh, on the briefs).

H. Justin Park argued the cause for respondent (Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Cherry Hill, attorneys).

2Opinion of the Court · LongJustice Long

In 2003, eighteen-year-old Ezrina Shim applied for admission to Rutgers University (Rutgers) for the fall term. At the time, she had lived in…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

3Cases cited28 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Mayflower Securities Co. v. Bureau of SecuritiesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  3. In Re TaylorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Township of EdisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
  5. In Re Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act RulesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API