Legal Opinion

Era Co. v. Pittsburgh Consolidation Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1946No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This appeal involves the construction of section 908 of the Business Corporation Law of May 5, 1933, P. L. 364, as amended March 31, 1941, P. L. 13 (PS Title 15, section 2852 — 908).

The act provides a remedy for the protection of a dissenting stockholder against a corporate merger and prescribes the method of procedure.

The shareholder (defined in the act as the registered owner), in order to secure the benefit of the provisions of the statute, must do three things: (a) file a written objection to the merger; (b) refrain from voting in favor of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  2. Thompson v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Bartron v. Northampton CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  4. In re the Appraisal of Shares of Common Stock of Universal Pictures Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
  5. Cheatham v. Wheeling & L. E. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1930

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Schwab Adoption CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Quein WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Robbins v. BeattySupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Mazeika v. AMERICAL OIL CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Duddy v. Conshohocken Printing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API