Legal Opinion

Sitter v. Oregon State Correctional Institution

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 1977No. 383-D, CA 6843PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

In this disciplinary proceeding petitioner appeals from an order finding that he violated the Corrections Division’s Major Rule 7, possession, manufacture or use of dangerous contraband (marihuana), and Major Rule 10, disobedience of an order, in that, contrary to a standing order of the institution that only one inmate at a time was to be present in the gear room, petitioner was there with another inmate.

Petitioner points out that Anderson v. OSP, 26 Or App 193, 552 P2d 256 (1976), holds that the predecessor to Major Rule 10 did not cover violation of a standing order. However, since that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hindman v. Oregon State Penitentiary, Corrections DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Anderson v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Haller v. Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API