Legal Opinion

Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. Curry

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1999No. 98-2642PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board. Respondent’s neglect in administering the estate, which caused damage to her clients, coupled with the violation of her previously stayed suspension, warrants an indefinite suspension. Cf. Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin (1998), 82 Ohio St.3d 100, 694 N.E.2d 899, in which we noted the attorney’s previously stayed suspension in imposing an indefinite suspension for conduct that similarly included violations of DR 1-102(A)(5) and (6), and 6-101(A)(3).

*382We further adopt the recommendation of the board but modify it in order to account for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API