Sweatt v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Shulman, Judge.
This appeal follows defendant’s conviction for theft of a motor vehicle. See Code Ann. § 26-1813. We affirm.
1. At trial, defense counsel made an opening statement following the close of the state’s evidence. In his opening statement, defense counsel related that he expected to prove that two others stole the truck; that appellant was a hitchhiker who had the misfortune of being a passenger in the stolen vehicle; that the two thieves abandoned the truck; and that the accused was apprehended while on his way to return the truck to its rightful owner. After counsel made this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ingram v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Lingerfelt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Wood v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Lindler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Burdett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Wood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
- Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Stanley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980