Legal Opinion

Herbert Kann Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 29, 1964No. Reap. Dec. 10673; Entry No. 402Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement relates to certain footwear, which was exported from Yokohama, Japan, and entered at the port of Mobile, Ala. At plaintiff’s request, the appeal was transferred to New York for hearing.

When the case was called for hearing at New York, defendant moved for dismissal of the appeal on the ground of untimeliness. Statutory provisions governing appeals for reappraisement are embodied in section 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (88 Treas. Dec. 186, T.D. 53318), which, so far as pertinent, reads as follows:.Tbe collector shall give written…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Bloch v. Eastern Mach. Screw Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922
  3. Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. Superfos v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API