Legal Opinion

Hege v. Ickes

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 1920No. Appeal, No. 142PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal, No. 142, Jan. T., 1920, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Franklin Co., Oct. T., 1919, No. 39, for plaintiff, on case-stated, in case of Annie E. Hege v. Samuel J. Ickes. Case-stated to determine marketability of title to realty. Before Gillan, P. J. The court entered judgment for plaintiff on the case-stated. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was entry of judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Frazer,

Plaintiff sued to recover the purchase price of real estate defendant contracted to buy, by agreement in writing. On a case-stated the court below entered judgment for plaintiff and defendant appealed, alleging as a defense the deed tendered by plaintiff failed to convey a good and marketable title.

Plaintiff’s title is derived through the will of her deceased husband wherein he devised his residuary estate, real and personal, to his wife “to have and to hold for her natural life and at her death, should she have any of my estate left, I would will that my adopted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beilstein v. BeilsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Allen v. HirlingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Kennedy v. Pittsburg & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Follweiler's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Reisher's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brennan's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Colonial Trust Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  3. Edwards v. NewlandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  4. Kidd's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Houser v. HouserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API