Legal Opinion

Trivisonno v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 24, 2002No. 01-3213PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Laura Trivisonno sued her former employer, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”), and two individual MetLife employees in Ohio state court alleging a violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. § 2601, et seq., common law promissory estoppel, and common law fraud. MetLife removed the case to federal court and filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay the action. The district court referred the motion to a magistrate judge, who recommended that the motion be granted. Neither party objected to the magistrate’s report and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Miller v. CurrieCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,943 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. And Sam Alberico v. Stanley F. JarosCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Woodrow W. Dawahare v. Adam A. Spencer Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. Smith Barney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. J.V.B. Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. United Steelworkers of America, Local 4839 v. New Idea Farm Equipment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. D.E.I., Inc. v. Ohio & Vicinity Regional Council of CarpentersCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API