Legal Opinion
Marshall Jenkins v. Montgomery Industries, Incorporated Carolina Benefit Administrators, Incorporated
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 1, 1996No. 95-1095PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge MURNAGHAN wrote the opinion, in which Judge MICHAEL and Senior Judge MICHAEL joined.
OPINION
MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judge:
Marshall Jenkins, as an employee at a South Carolina warehouse owned by Montgomery Industries, Inc., was covered by the company’s employee benefit and health care plan, 1 which was subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Under the Plan, a claim related to medical treatment for any loss sustained while the claimant was intoxicated is excluded from coverage. Jenkins sought coverage for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- John Doe Firm Doe v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, D/B/A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital AreaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Todd v. AIG Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Judith P. Masella v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- United McGill Corporation v. Sharon StinnettCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Stamp v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Canada Life Assurance Company v. Estate of Harvey M. Lebowitz Eunice Lebowitz Max E. Blumenthal, Co-Personal RepresentativeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Kohl v. Association of Trial Lawyers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1998
- Sharon Pitman v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.