Legal Opinion

Bendik v. Sommer Bros. Construction Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1964No. Appeals, Nos. 22 and 23PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

This is a suit to recover a balance due on a building contract plus some items for extra work. All parties have appealed. The principal amount due under the contract by the defendants to the plaintiff, as determined by the jury and modified by the court below, is not under attack in these appeals.

The plaintiff’s appeal raises the correctness of the allowance of a set-off by the court below covering expenses, including attorneys’ fees, incident to discharging a mechanic’s lien filed by the plaintiff in violation of the contract between the parties. That this filing was in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bendik v. Uniontown S. R. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Country World Casinos, Inc. v. Tommyknocker Casino Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Ostroff v. YaslykSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  3. Altanatural Inc v. New Investments IncUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  4. Country World Casinos, Inc. v. Tommyknocker Casino Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  5. New Investments Inc. v. Altanatural CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API