Legal Opinion · Dissent

Central Storage Warehouse Co. v. Pickering

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1926No. 19049Published

1DissentAllen, J.

I dissent from the opinion of the majority upon two grounds, namely:(1) Section 4-A of the warehouse receipt does not, by simple insertion in the receipt, the receipt being accepted, constitute a contract under the General Code.(2) There was no meeting of the minds upon the provision that the warehouseman should be liable for damages up to the sum of $25, and no more, unless the value thereof was made known at the time of storing and a higher storage rate paid therefor, and hence no contract was made between the parties upon that point.

Does Section 4-A of the warehouse receipt, the receipt…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Blossom v. . DoddNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  2. Dieterle v. BekinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gulf Compress Co. v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Madan v. . SherardNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Southern Express Co. v. MoonMississippi Supreme Court · 1863

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API