Legal Opinion

Taylor, for Use and Benefit, Etc. v. Broughton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 15, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming.

J. J. Taylor, as a citizen and taxpayer of Laurel county for and on behalf of himself and all other taxpayers therein and for the use and benefit of the county, instituted this action against William Broughton, jailer of Laurel county, and I). C. Edwards and Nat B. Sewell, sureties on his official bond, seeking to recover sums received by Broughton as such jailer alleged to be in excess of the maximum annual salary permitted by the Constitution (section 246). On final hearing the court dismissed plaintiff’s petition and he is appealing.

It is…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Shipp v. RodesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  2. Mills v. LantripCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Taylor, County Jailer v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  4. Holland, Jailer v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Monohan v. Grayson County Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rybolt v. FutrellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Taylor Ex Rel. Laurel County v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API