State v. Austin
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, C.J.
Defendant challenges imposition of a 2-year sentence for a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (UCSA) (RCW 69.50) claiming her crime was an anticipatory offense punishable by a maximum of 1 year. We affirm the trial court and uphold the imposition of a 2-year sentence.
By amended information filed September 18, 1981, the King County Prosecutor charged Austin with obtaining "a controlled substance ... by means of a false and forged prescription . . . [cjontrary to RCW 69.50.403(a)(3) ..." The prosecutor also accused Austin, in count 2, of "the crime of attempted violation of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. MajorsWashington Supreme Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.