Legal Opinion

State v. Austin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1986No. 51354-6PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDolliver, C.J.

Defendant challenges imposition of a 2-year sentence for a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act (UCSA) (RCW 69.50) claiming her crime was an anticipatory offense punishable by a maximum of 1 year. We affirm the trial court and uphold the imposition of a 2-year sentence.

By amended information filed September 18, 1981, the King County Prosecutor charged Austin with obtaining "a controlled substance ... by means of a false and forged prescription . . . [cjontrary to RCW 69.50.403(a)(3) ..." The prosecutor also accused Austin, in count 2, of "the crime of attempted violation of the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  2. State v. OsborneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. MajorsWashington Supreme Court · 1980

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. LynnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  4. State v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  5. State v. CameronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API