Legal Opinion

McNaghten Loan Co. v. Sandifer

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1933No. 31,032PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The main question involved in this appeal is the extent of the liability of one who indorses a promissory note without recourse when one of the signatures on the note is a forgery. The trial court held that the indorser was liable, but only to the extent of a possible recovery from-the party whose name was forged. Both parties appeal.

The plaintiff loan company, after having sued the makers of a note for $1,230 and failed to collect anything thereon, brought this action against the party who had indorsed the note without recourse. Attached…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Challiss v. McCrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  2. Dent v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Isaacs v. Jackson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  4. Sidney Smith & Son v. McNairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  5. Jacquart v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Steele v. J. I. Case Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  3. Newark Finance Corp. v. AcocellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  4. Securities Investment Co. of St. Louis v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
  5. First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. Montgomery County Bank & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API