McNaghten Loan Co. v. Sandifer
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Hutchison, J.:
The main question involved in this appeal is the extent of the liability of one who indorses a promissory note without recourse when one of the signatures on the note is a forgery. The trial court held that the indorser was liable, but only to the extent of a possible recovery from-the party whose name was forged. Both parties appeal.
The plaintiff loan company, after having sued the makers of a note for $1,230 and failed to collect anything thereon, brought this action against the party who had indorsed the note without recourse. Attached…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Challiss v. McCrumSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
- Dent v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Isaacs v. Jackson Motor Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Sidney Smith & Son v. McNairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Jacquart v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Steele v. J. I. Case Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- Allen v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
- Newark Finance Corp. v. AcocellaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Securities Investment Co. of St. Louis v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1967
- First Pennsylvania Banking & Trust Co. v. Montgomery County Bank & Trust Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.