People v. Taylor
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck; J.) Respondent was convicted of entering’ a barn in tbe daytime, with intent to commit the crime of larceny, and sentenced to the State prison for 2 years and 9 months. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.
The respondent was convicted of the crime of entering the barn of one Hugh Erazier, in the daytime, with intent to commit the crime of larceny. Twelve fleeces of wool were stolen from the barn. The evidence on the part of the people convinced the jury of the defendant’s guilt. It was sufficient to sustain the verdict if the jury believed the witnesses, and it is evident that they did.
Certain errors are alleged, which will now be considered.
1. At the opening of court, on the first day of the term, the names of the jurors were called, and the judge gave them some preliminary instructions on…
2Cited by3 opinions
- People v. ButlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. DanenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. MaloyMichigan Supreme Court · 1919