Legal Opinion

Frank T. Shull and Ann R. Shull v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 20, 1959No. 7884_1PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge.

The question is whether the taxpayers are bound by their election to have their gain upon the liquidation of a closely held corporation recognized and taxed pursuant to the provisions of § 112 (b)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. § 112(b) (7). The taxpayers contend that the proceedings did not meet the requirements of § 112(b) (7), and that, in any event, their election was filed under a mistake of material fact.

The taxpayers were the owners of all of tl\-e outstanding stock of Shull Electric Products Corporation, a corporation organized under the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meyer's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Shull v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  3. Loren T. Raymond and Corrine Raymond v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Estate of Stamos v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970
  2. Bartlett & Co. Grain v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Dougherty v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  4. Frank T. Shull and Ann R. Shull v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Estate of Darby v. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API