Legal Opinion
Schneller v. Moed
Civil Court of the City of New York
Decided June 28, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Robert D. Lippmann, J.
Petitioner landlord brings this holdover proceeding alleging illegal occupants or roommates in violation of a lease agreement and in violation of Real Property Law § 235-f.
A lease effective October 26, 1978 was offered respondent which she refused to execute because it contained a restrictive clause limiting occupancy of the premises to “the tenant and a male occupant”. One month later another lease agreement, modified to the extent of deleting the restrictive clause, was executed by the parties. At its expiration in January 1981, a renewal lease,…
2Cited by6 opinions
- 520 East 81st Street Associates v. Roughton-HesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Barbizon Owners Corp. v. ChudickCivil Court of the City of New York · 1994
- Capital Holding Co. v. StavrolakesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- First Hudson Capital, LLC v. SeabornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mitchell Gardens No. 1 Cooperative Corp. v. CataldoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.