Legal Opinion

City of Oshkosh v. Kubiak

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 15, 2017No. 2016AP804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHagedorn, J.

¶ 1. The City of Oshkosh has a special events ordinance that requires an "organizer" of an event to apply for a permit and pay the City for any extraordinary services associated with that event. For several years, Joseph E. Kubiak applied for a permit and paid the required costs as the purported organizer of semi-annual gatherings called the Oshkosh Pub Crawl. However, in 2014, Kubiak refused to comply, and the City filed suit. After a bench trial, the circuit court concluded that the meaning of "organizer" was unconstitutionally vague and dismissed the suit. The City appeals and argues that…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Jose Guadalupe ValenzuelaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. State v. ZwickerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Baldwin v. Milwaukee Cnty.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API