Legal Opinion

Reed v. Tarbell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1842Published

The facts of these cases are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHubbard, J.

The first of these cases is assumpsit by the indorsee of a promissory note against the indorser; and the money counts are added. The note declared on bears date December 16th 1833, and is for $ 1025 payable in six months. It was signed by Abel Baker, and made payable to the defendant, and by him indorsed. At the time the note fell due, it was held by the South Bank ; and it was afterwards paid and taken up by the plaintiff, as second indorser. Before it fell due, Baker, the promisor, failed, and made an assignment of his effects, by an indenture of three parts, bearing date February 18th…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pierson v. HookerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  2. Lyman v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  3. Bruen v. MarquandNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  4. Sargent v. AppletonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API