Legal Opinion

County of Sonoma v. Federal Housing Finance Agency

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 2013No. 12-16986PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURGUIA, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) is the regulator and conservator of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae (the “Enterprises”). The Enterprises are government-sponsored entities that purchase and securitize residential mortgages. FHFA issued a “directive” preventing the Enterprises from buying mortgages on properties encumbered by liens made under so-called property-assessed clean energy (“PACE”) programs, which finance environmental improvements on residential properties — and in return take an interest in those properties senior to any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Town of Babylon v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Whitney F. SHARPE; Mona E. Sharpe, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FDIC, Receiver for Pioneer Bank, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  3. Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations v. BlankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Leon County Florida v. Federal Housing Finance AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Perry Capital LLC v. MnuchinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. Collins v. YellenSupreme Court of the United States · 2021
  3. Patrick Collins v. Steven Mnuchin, SecretarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  4. Perry Capital LLC v. LewDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  5. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API