Legal Opinion

People v. Lyttle

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

So far as the record informs us, the game conducted by the defendant was one. involving a trial or test of skill, and not one dependent upon the drawing or choice of numbers. If the fact is otherwise, as the People’s brief-suggests, appropriate evidence should have been offered to bring the case within the statute.

Penal Law, section 974, permits a prosecution where the result of a wager is dependent on the selection of numbers, even though not strictly the game of policy, but in such circumstances the information should be framed upon that theory.

The judgment should be affirmed.

Cardozo, Ch.…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HinesNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  2. People v. CohenNew York Magistrate Court · 1936
  3. People v. PiersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. People v. EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. People v. WeberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API