Cress v. Ivens
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Woodbury District Court. — Hon. R. R. Gay-nor, Judge. Suit in equity by the plaintiffs named and others to recover of the defendants and P. O. Molan on account of fraud iu the purchase of lands. There were judgments against the defendants Ivens and Andre, from which they appeal.
1Opinion of the Court
Sherwin, I.
The defendants Ivens, Andre, and Molan organized a company, of which the plaintiffs and others were members, for the purchase of about 15,000 acres of Minnesota land of the Boston & Duluth Farm Land Company. The parties interested in the purchase of the land, including Ivens and Andre, entered into a written contract with the land company, whereby' they agreed to take the land at' $18,138, 18,138 of which was to be, and was paid, when the contract was made, and the remainder of which was to be paid in five equal payments of $12,000 each, with interest. Ivens and Andre were acting…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- District Township of Boomer v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Reiger v. TurleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Faust v. HosfordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Carrier v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1890
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Waugh v. Guthrie Gas, Light, Fuel & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Higbee v. WalshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
- Smith v. Middle States Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
- Conklin v. TowneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.