Legal Opinion

Lilylands Canal & Reservoir Co. v. Wood

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1913No. 7811PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Montrose District Court. — Hon. Sprigg Shackleford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bailey

Lucy F. Wood, for herself and others in like interest, brought suit in the district court of Montrose county against the Lilylands Canal and Reservoir Company, to have certain amendments, increasing the capital stock of the company and enlarging its objects and purposes, declared void and their enforcement enjoined. The cause was tried by Phillip W. Mothersill, Esq., referee, who reported findings of both law and fact, upon which judgment was entered for plaintiff as prayed, and the defendant brings the cause here for review.

It is unnecessary for the purposes of this opinion to rehearse in…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  2. Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. LewisohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Mitchell v. BeckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  5. MacUllar v. . McKinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shugart v. MaytagSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Jeffs v. Utah Power & Light Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. Stewart v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
  4. Bowers v. RIO GRANDE INVESTMENT COMPANYSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  5. Colorado Industrial Loan & Investment Co. v. ClemSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API