Equal Employment Opportunity, Commission v. U-Haul International, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING EEOC’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT
DIANE K. VESCOVO, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is the August 13, 2012 motion of the plaintiff, the Equal Employ*324ment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), seeking leave to amend its complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a). (Mot. for Leave to Amend Compl., D.E. 62.) Specifically, the EEOC seeks an amendment to add a retaliation claim on behalf of complainant Nathaniel Baldwin (“Baldwin”). The defendants, U-Haul International, Inc. and U-Haul Company of Tennessee (collectively referred to as “U-Haul”),…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mary Elizabeth Leary and Glenda H. Williams v. Stephen DaeschnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Lynn Noyes v. Kelly Services, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aaron L. Lewis, III v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Brandon Price v. City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Officer C. Pittman, Officer C. Yancey, Officer McFadden, Officer Mitchell, and Officer McNealDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026
- Brent Gay v. Union Local School District, et al.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2026
- Bryant v. GlaxoSmithKline LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Campbell v. Premierfirst Home Health Care Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.