Legal Opinion

Francisco R. v. Waterloo

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 19, 1897No. Nos. 44, 49. and 50PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BUTLER, District Judge.

On Monday, May 21, 1894, the Francisco was lying at the Ballast wharf, on the"western -side of the Schuylkill, off Point Breeze. A short distance below at this wharf, *114the Norwood was lying. At the same time, the Waterloo and Glenalvon were moored at the storage company’s wharf, on the eastern side of the river, opposite the Francisco, the Glenalvon lying next the wharf and the Waterloo by her side. The latter vessels are very large and heavy, and -were attached to the wharf in the usual manner, with lines fastened to eight of its posts. For several days prior to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Willey v. Allegheny CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Crawford v. Allegheny CitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Girard Point Storage Co. v. RoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API