Gordon v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Branch, Judge.
On this out-of-time appeal from his conviction for aggravated battery and other crimes, Bertram Gordon argues that trial counsel was ineffective. We affirm.
“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer enjoying a presumption of innocence.” (Citation and punctuation omitted.) Reese v. State, 270 Ga.App. 522, 523 (607 SE2d 165) (2004). *768We neither weigh the evidence nor judge the credibility of witnesses, but determine only whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Suggs v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
- Reese v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.