Legal Opinion

Russellville Special School District No. 14 v. Tinsley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant on a written contract by which the appellant agreed to employ the appellee to teach a common school in the appellant district for the term of nine months, commencing on the 20th day of September, 1920, and to pay her for her services the sum of $45 for-each school month for lialf-day teaching, and the appellee agreed on her part “to keep said school open three hours each school day; to keep carefully the register required by law; to preserve from injury to the utmost of her power the district property; to give said school her entire time…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Winkle v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  2. Gardenhire v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
  3. Sweet v. McEwenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City National Bank of Fort Smith, Arkansas v. VanderboomDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1968
  2. Western Grove School District v. StrainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Freeman v. Sierra County Board of EducationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  4. National Labor Relations Board v. The Madison Courier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  5. National Labor Relations Board v. The Madison Courier, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API