Legal Opinion
Stevens Plumbing Supply Co. v. Bi-County Plumbing & Heating Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1978PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David T. Gibbons, J.
Motion to punish the defendant, Carl Winkler, for contempt of court for failure to answer a subpoena duces tecum is determined as follows:
Section 756 .of the Judiciary Law mandates, inter alia, that: "The application shall contain on its face a notice that the purpose of the hearing is to punish the accused for contempt of court, and that such punishment may consist of fine or imprisonment, or both, according to law together with the following legend printed or type written in a size equal to at least eight point bold type:
*457warning: your failure to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rutherford v. . HolmesNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Fromme v. . GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Goldie v. GoldieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- Fromme v. GrayNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
- People ex rel. Supreme Court v. AlbertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barreca v. BarrecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Garrison Fuel Oil of Long Island, Inc. v. Grippo, New York County Courts1985
- In re Dawn P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Bank Leumi Trust Co. v. Taylor-CishahayoCivil Court of the City of New York · 1990
- Mente v. WenzelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.