Legal Opinion

State v. Navas

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1996No. 16695PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAMIL, Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the Intermediate Court of Appeals (ICA) in State v. Navas, 81 Hawaii 29, 911 P.2d 1101 (App.1995) [hereinafter Navas /], specifically to address the proper standard of review to apply when reviewing a magistrate’s 1 determination of probable cause to issue a search warrant.

I. FACTS

The following are the facts as provided in Navas I.

On October 7, 1991, the Narcotics Division of the Honolulu Police Department (HPD) received a tip from an anonymous caller that Edward, who lived at 151 Circle Drive, Wahiáwá, and worked as a…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. KotisHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. PulseHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. Hoshijo Ex Rel. WhiteHawaii Supreme Court · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API