People v. Cruz
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, the conviction reinstated, and the case remitted to the Appellate Division for review of the facts.
The observations made by the police and the defendant’s furtive movements as the police approached were sufficient to warrant inquiry (People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210). Under the circumstances we cannot say that it was unreasonable for the officers to focus their inquiry on the contents of the defendant’s hand and therefore to ask that he remove the bottle which he held as they approached. Removal of the bag of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. NicolasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. McNattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. DeanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994