Legal Opinion · Dissent

Washington v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 1, 1988Published

1Dissent

Milonas and Smith, JJ.,

dissent in a memorandum by Smith, J., as follows: I would reverse and remand for a hearing to determine whether actual notice was received by the city. Plaintiff was allegedly injured on or about May 21, 1985 when a building owned by the city collapsed. At the time, work was allegedly being done on the premises by Cross Bay Demolition Company pursuant to a contract with the city.

In his motion to file a late notice of claim, a motion made in August 1986, plaintiff alleges that the city had actual notice of the facts constituting the claim because of (1) the presence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gerzel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. King v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API