People v. Stern

This appeal was heard on defendant’s application, consented to by the district attorney, upon the printed record in People v. Marcus (220 App. Div. 697).

In this case we are constrained to reverse the judgment of conviction for the sole reason that there was no sufficient evidence at the trial showing possession of the stolen property by the defendant Stern. In the case of the other defendants, Marcus, Tilzer and Stein, there was ev'dence of possession of the stolen furs in the defendants on the day of their arrest in Brooklyn, three days after the burglary in New York. But in the case of…