Legal Opinion

Lombardo v. Warner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 4, 2004No. 02-35269PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

2Cited by6 opinions

James Lombardo v. Bruce Warner, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
Lombardo v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 2006
James Lombardo v. Bruce Warner, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
JAMES LOMBARDO, — v. BRUCE WARNER, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, —Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
James Lombardo v. Bruce Warner, in His Official Capacity as Director of the Oregon Capacity as Director of the Oregon Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.