Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States

I respectfully dissent, as it is my opinion that the very able recommended decision of Trial Judge Colaianni that the subject invention is invalid is fully supported by the facts and the law, whereas, the decision of the majority that the invention is valid is clearly contrary to the evidence and the applicable law. I adopt the Trial Judge’s findings of fact, decision, and conclusion of law as my dissent, along with additional comments and reasons as follows:

"opinion*

COLAIANNI, Trial Judge: The Hughes Aircraft Company seeks reasonable and entire compensation, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, for…