Legal Opinion
Petition of Merry Queen Transfer Corp.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 12, 1967No. AD 20622PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WEINSTEIN, District Judge.
This is an ex parte application by an attorney made “pursuant to Rule IV, subdivision 5(d),” of Part 3 of the Rules of the Appellate Division of the Second Department “and Civil Rule 15 of the Rules of this Court” fixing “compensation at an amount greater than the sliding scale schedule contained in said Appellate Division Rules.”
The application is accompanied by an affidavit of the attorney and written consent of the three clients involved, Mary O’Rourke, Patrick O’Rourke and Priscilla O’Rourke. Each of these clients is now of full age and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Theard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gair v. PeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- In Re Disbarment of IssermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. NobleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Michael RappaportCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. NobleDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1967
- Matter of GLSDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Callahan v. American Sugar Refining Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1969
- Matter of GLSDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984