Legal Opinion

Holden v. City of Crawfordsville

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1895No. 17,305PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Howard, O. J.

This was a proceeding under the statute for the opening of an alley in the city of Crawfordsville. Sections 3629-3657, R. S. 1894 (sections 3166-3194, R. S. 1881).

Complaint is first made of the form of the resolution of the common council approving the final report of the city commissioners and appropriating the land for the alley, for the reason that, coupled with such resolution, was a proviso that appellant’s damages should not be paid until after the collection of the assessments for benefits.

It is provided in the statute that the common council may delay the proceedings for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reeves v. GrottendickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Spiegel v. GansbergIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. City of Terre Haute v. BlakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  4. City of Terre Haute v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Graves v. Town of MiddletownIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fricke v. AngemeierIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Vermillion v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Larch v. HolzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API