Legal Opinion

Kalashnikov v. Salt Lake City

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided October 27, 2016No. 20160421-CAPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam Decision

2Per curiam

¶1 Earl AI Kalashnikov seeks review of the district court’s various orders resulting in the dismissal of all of the defendants in the action. This matter is before the court on Ap-pellees’ motion for summary disposition on the basis that the issues raised by Kalashnikov are “so insubstantial as not to merit further proceedings and consideration” by the court. Utah R. App. P. 10(a)(2)(A). We affirm.

¶2 Kalashnikov filed a complaint against various parties claiming that security officials accosted him at the Salt Lake City Main Library. Kalashnikov averred in the complaint…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fox v. Brigham Young UniversityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  2. Hansen v. Harper Excavating, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. Lucas v. Wells Fargo Bank, NACourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API