Legal Opinion

State v. Eaton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 11, 1965No. 51369PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

Appellant filed his motion to vacate- judgment and sentence (five years total imprisonment for burglary, second degree, and stealing) in the trial court pursuant to the provisions of Supreme Court Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. Thereafter, on December 29-, 1964, the court took up the motion, and having examined it and the files and records in the case, overruled it.

The sole ground for the relief requested in the motion is that the “information is fatally defective and is insufficient to sustain the imposition of Judgment and Sentence thereon, in that the allegations as therein…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. ZammarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  4. State v. HedgpethSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  5. State v. KelleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ToneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Maggard v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971
  3. Kansas City v. StricklinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Laster v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API